<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google’s Browser Sheds Its ‘Beta’ Label</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/</link>
	<description>Gadget iPhone Review News Media Sync Phone Images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lajos</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21428</link>
		<dc:creator>Lajos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21428</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think I&#039;m switching from firefox, either. In my opinion, mozilla has done a great job with their browser. If you took a little time to understand it, you can mold it to whatever you need it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m switching from firefox, either. In my opinion, mozilla has done a great job with their browser. If you took a little time to understand it, you can mold it to whatever you need it to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ulani</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ulani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21429</guid>
		<description>I need my plugins.. when they add them I will consider it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need my plugins.. when they add them I will consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meurig</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21430</link>
		<dc:creator>Meurig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21430</guid>
		<description>woo. now when they make it for os x, i&#039;ll be interested : ) come on google!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woo. now when they make it for os x, i&#8217;ll be interested : ) come on google!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuyen</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21431</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21431</guid>
		<description>You could just use Safari; they&#039;re both based on Webkit, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could just use Safari; they&#8217;re both based on Webkit, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fareeda</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21432</link>
		<dc:creator>Fareeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21432</guid>
		<description>Addons is definently what is needed. Thats the reason why I decided to stay with firefox. But google is cool, and they are new, I&#039;m sure in time they will make it more advanced, I mean.. c&#039;mon it&#039;s google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addons is definently what is needed. Thats the reason why I decided to stay with firefox. But google is cool, and they are new, I&#8217;m sure in time they will make it more advanced, I mean.. c&#8217;mon it&#8217;s google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Italia</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21433</link>
		<dc:creator>Italia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21433</guid>
		<description>Control+ feature is weak.  Needs to work like Firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Control+ feature is weak.  Needs to work like Firefox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nell</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21434</link>
		<dc:creator>Nell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21434</guid>
		<description>Add a simple keystroke to change tabs.  Sometimes, I just want to scroll through tabs quickly with a simple keystroke rather than reach for the mouse.  Firefox can do this via ctrl-tab, but as far as I can tell, based on searches and Chrome&#039;s site, Chrome cannot do this, or allow for programmed keystrokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add a simple keystroke to change tabs.  Sometimes, I just want to scroll through tabs quickly with a simple keystroke rather than reach for the mouse.  Firefox can do this via ctrl-tab, but as far as I can tell, based on searches and Chrome&#8217;s site, Chrome cannot do this, or allow for programmed keystrokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21435</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21435</guid>
		<description>actually ctrl-tab does work with chrome,try using the latest version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually ctrl-tab does work with chrome,try using the latest version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philomena</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21436</link>
		<dc:creator>Philomena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21436</guid>
		<description>More addons would definitely make it more of an option as compared to Firefox. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More addons would definitely make it more of an option as compared to Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emiko</title>
		<link>http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/comment-page-1/#comment-21437</link>
		<dc:creator>Emiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gadgetmania.com/2009/01/google%e2%80%99s-browser-sheds-its-%e2%80%98beta%e2%80%99-label/#comment-21437</guid>
		<description>Google has already said they&#039;re working on addons. Just wait, they&#039;ll have it out soon enough. Even with this release they said that addons are coming along quite nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has already said they&#8217;re working on addons. Just wait, they&#8217;ll have it out soon enough. Even with this release they said that addons are coming along quite nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
