Social Web sites face transparency questions
Properly balancing the interests of various constituencies — and retaining their loyalty, perhaps through improved channels of communications — will prove key to whether the sites can grow into vibrant, moneymaking operations for years to come.
News link: here










11 Responses
3.28.2009
Obama promises come with an expiration date; They’re worth about as much as the slime growing in the back of my refrigerator.
3.28.2009
Ectoplasm! I’ll give you $500,000 for it.
3.28.2009
You hear that Digg.
3.28.2009
LOLyou know when i bury things the number doesn’t go down…wtf.
3.28.2009
since i set foot on digg i knew was some sort of rigged game, just like the economy you think you are free to do what you want, but there is power users that benefit from that belief
3.28.2009
new digger from sunstar-shop.com
3.28.2009
Digg is already #1 they just have to try not to piss people off which will make them go to their competitors to help build their social networks.
3.28.2009
You know what else has a transparent face? My ass.
3.28.2009
You know what else has a transparent ass? My face.
3.28.2009
There is both pros and cons to user submitted content. I mean, look at Youtube.
3.28.2009
Dear sir,I looked at youtube.Please now provide me with 1 million pros.