Thank you for taking the time to read this post. We hope you've enjoyed the
content here. Please feel free to use the links below to share this post with others.
49 Responses
Neith
10.18.2009
I wonder what makes up the majority of that data, pointless status updates or mafia war invites.
Rafiq
10.18.2009
25Tb of pokes
Saba
10.18.2009
atari 2600 emulator
Ryker
10.18.2009
See, you can write bad code and just throw more hardware at it.
Kylie
10.18.2009
So one server per 10,000 users? I wonder what Digg has?
Dallon
10.18.2009
50% of it is probably Mafia Wars and Farmville.
Paco
10.18.2009
But can they run Crysis?
Damita
10.18.2009
The NSA Laughes
Swoosie
10.18.2009
Google considers 25TB of data to be a small rounding error.
I’m pretty sure it’s, by far, pictures. 20 billion unique pictures, each in 4 different sizes, according to the article.
Hendrix
10.18.2009
That’s crazy.
Bai
10.18.2009
Not nearly as many servers as Google.. estimated to be over 700,000 servers…
Oran
10.18.2009
Skynet
Filipina
10.18.2009
I’d like to see their database structure. I bet it’s insane.
Giorgio
10.18.2009
Someone explain to me how Facebook calculated 25 terabytes into "1000x more mail than the post office delivers everyday". I tried using google calculator but it doesn’t have the units "mail".
Xandy
10.18.2009
On the plus side, when an earthquake happens and the servers sink into a chasm, they’ll be a rush to be the first to comment on the Digg article about it (assuming that the Digg servers don’t join them) with, "And nothing of value was lost."
Frick
10.18.2009
**Hu99 is having breakfast**
Ginny
10.18.2009
Yea…something like 30,000 I’m guessing.
Vlad
10.18.2009
"(stupidly) MySQL"? What would be a better alternative?
Jovana
10.18.2009
Looks like domestic spying just a whole lot easier
Helki
10.18.2009
Man I have to facebook about this!
Iren
10.18.2009
The rule of thumb with this kind of thing is that 11 users out of 100 will be actively using whatever it is they have an account on at any given time. So out of 10,000 users, one can expect 1,100 users actively using that server at peak load. Out of that, with facebook, you’re mostly talking about database reads. Though their backend is (stupidly) MySQL, even it can easily handle the "clicker", which probably amounts to somewhere around 3-5 simple queries per second, and likely somewhere around 1 insert (upload/change) every two seconds.If what is implied in this article is true, you frankly don’t need anything bigger than a quad core xeon, 8 gigs of RAM, and a three year warranty for each 1u server— which all run Linux, so software licensing (between the OS and the database back end) costs nothing.Digg isn’t anywhere close to as complex. I can’t imagine the LAMP machines that Digg requires needing to be anything bigger than a third of what facebook uses per same number of users.
Anise
10.18.2009
And the "Basic Programming" cartridge.
Edie
10.18.2009
Seriously, What is so great about those things?
Idalis
10.18.2009
2109 ???2159 Profit.
Frigg
10.18.2009
That’s what I was going to say.All that computer power going to waste.
Nuria
10.18.2009
And pointes.
Valiant
10.18.2009
Think of all the fun things you can do with that extra space!
Giselle
10.18.2009
Actually, it’s Facebook.
Heller
10.18.2009
Facebook is still unbelievably ***** slow
Jovanna
10.18.2009
25 TB of information about the timber industry
Gallagher
10.18.2009
…and still not a single dollar of net income. The clock is ticking. Remember 1999?
Myla
10.18.2009
That’s over 9,000 servers.
Raheem
10.18.2009
Just think about google, facebook doesn’t feel so crazy after all?
Bast
10.18.2009
So don’t upload them there. Problem solved.
Hakan
10.18.2009
Try the more accepted "Library of Congress" unit.
Lyall
10.18.2009
*NeoNevermore likes this.*
Henrik
10.18.2009
Probably could have converted mail into bits by taking the average number of words/images per piece of mail.
Zuleikha
10.18.2009
Such a waste of hardware
Edric
10.18.2009
My boss once suggested we may need a 5 TB harddrive to back up our website (Which is about 30 MB). I’m tempted to show him this to illustrate his lack of technological knowledge, but I prefer him to think he’s an expert and not know what I do.
Murron
10.18.2009
If it crashes nothing of value will be lost.
Rip
10.18.2009
They don’t use a standard relational database but instead use Cassandra: incubator.apache.org/cassandra/Interesting read about the "No-SQL movement": 25hoursaday.com/weblog/CommentView.aspx …
Annis
10.18.2009
why didn’t you just delete your email addy instead of taking the cap it into mspaint to scrawl that red mess over it?
Fanny
10.18.2009
OVER 9000!
Shonka
10.18.2009
I think you mean 8Tb = 1TB, no?
Emele
10.18.2009
And watches.Damn.
Hume
10.18.2009
300 million what flavor ice cream best describes you quiz results.
Xing xing
10.18.2009
Wow. I’ve run a small forum/ blogging site since mid February. The database is currently 8.3 MB. Puts things in perspective.
49 Responses
10.18.2009
I wonder what makes up the majority of that data, pointless status updates or mafia war invites.
10.18.2009
25Tb of pokes
10.18.2009
atari 2600 emulator
10.18.2009
See, you can write bad code and just throw more hardware at it.
10.18.2009
So one server per 10,000 users? I wonder what Digg has?
10.18.2009
50% of it is probably Mafia Wars and Farmville.
10.18.2009
But can they run Crysis?
10.18.2009
The NSA Laughes
10.18.2009
Google considers 25TB of data to be a small rounding error.
10.18.2009
1959 Telephone lines 2009 Servers2059 Magical glowing orbs
10.18.2009
I’m pretty sure it’s, by far, pictures. 20 billion unique pictures, each in 4 different sizes, according to the article.
10.18.2009
That’s crazy.
10.18.2009
Not nearly as many servers as Google.. estimated to be over 700,000 servers…
10.18.2009
Skynet
10.18.2009
I’d like to see their database structure. I bet it’s insane.
10.18.2009
Someone explain to me how Facebook calculated 25 terabytes into "1000x more mail than the post office delivers everyday". I tried using google calculator but it doesn’t have the units "mail".
10.18.2009
On the plus side, when an earthquake happens and the servers sink into a chasm, they’ll be a rush to be the first to comment on the Digg article about it (assuming that the Digg servers don’t join them) with, "And nothing of value was lost."
10.18.2009
**Hu99 is having breakfast**
10.18.2009
Yea…something like 30,000 I’m guessing.
10.18.2009
"(stupidly) MySQL"? What would be a better alternative?
10.18.2009
Looks like domestic spying just a whole lot easier
10.18.2009
Man I have to facebook about this!
10.18.2009
The rule of thumb with this kind of thing is that 11 users out of 100 will be actively using whatever it is they have an account on at any given time. So out of 10,000 users, one can expect 1,100 users actively using that server at peak load. Out of that, with facebook, you’re mostly talking about database reads. Though their backend is (stupidly) MySQL, even it can easily handle the "clicker", which probably amounts to somewhere around 3-5 simple queries per second, and likely somewhere around 1 insert (upload/change) every two seconds.If what is implied in this article is true, you frankly don’t need anything bigger than a quad core xeon, 8 gigs of RAM, and a three year warranty for each 1u server— which all run Linux, so software licensing (between the OS and the database back end) costs nothing.Digg isn’t anywhere close to as complex. I can’t imagine the LAMP machines that Digg requires needing to be anything bigger than a third of what facebook uses per same number of users.
10.18.2009
And the "Basic Programming" cartridge.
10.18.2009
Seriously, What is so great about those things?
10.18.2009
2109 ???2159 Profit.
10.18.2009
That’s what I was going to say.All that computer power going to waste.
10.18.2009
And pointes.
10.18.2009
Think of all the fun things you can do with that extra space!
10.18.2009
Actually, it’s Facebook.
10.18.2009
Facebook is still unbelievably ***** slow
10.18.2009
25 TB of information about the timber industry
10.18.2009
…and still not a single dollar of net income. The clock is ticking. Remember 1999?
10.18.2009
That’s over 9,000 servers.
10.18.2009
Just think about google, facebook doesn’t feel so crazy after all?
10.18.2009
So don’t upload them there. Problem solved.
10.18.2009
Try the more accepted "Library of Congress" unit.
10.18.2009
*NeoNevermore likes this.*
10.18.2009
Probably could have converted mail into bits by taking the average number of words/images per piece of mail.
10.18.2009
Such a waste of hardware
10.18.2009
My boss once suggested we may need a 5 TB harddrive to back up our website (Which is about 30 MB). I’m tempted to show him this to illustrate his lack of technological knowledge, but I prefer him to think he’s an expert and not know what I do.
10.18.2009
If it crashes nothing of value will be lost.
10.18.2009
They don’t use a standard relational database but instead use Cassandra: incubator.apache.org/cassandra/Interesting read about the "No-SQL movement": 25hoursaday.com/weblog/CommentView.aspx …
10.18.2009
why didn’t you just delete your email addy instead of taking the cap it into mspaint to scrawl that red mess over it?
10.18.2009
OVER 9000!
10.18.2009
I think you mean 8Tb = 1TB, no?
10.18.2009
And watches.Damn.
10.18.2009
300 million what flavor ice cream best describes you quiz results.
10.18.2009
Wow. I’ve run a small forum/ blogging site since mid February. The database is currently 8.3 MB. Puts things in perspective.